In order to prevent unfair practices in the publication activity (plagiarism, presentation of false information, and others.), In order to ensure a high quality of scientific publications, public recognition obtained by the author of the scientific results, each member of the editorial board, author, reviewer, publisher, as well as institutions involved in publishing process must comply with ethical standards, rules and regulations and to take all reasonable measures to prevent violations. Compliance with the rules of ethics of scientific publications of all participants in this process helps to ensure the rights of authors of intellectual property, improve the quality of the publication and to avoid misuse of copyright material in the interests of individuals.

The basic terms used in this situation:

The author  - a person or group of persons (group of authors), participating in the creation of the publication of the results of scientific research.
Chief editor - the person who makes the final decision with regard to the production and issue of the magazine.

Publisher  - legal or natural person exercising public release of a scientific publication.

The scientific article  - complete and publish the author's work.

Plagiarism  - intentional attribution of authorship of another work of science or art, other people's ideas or inventions. Plagiarism may be a violation of copyright law and patent law and may entail legal responsibility as such.

Editor  - a representative of the scientific journal or publisher, prepares materials for publication, as well as maintaining contact with authors and readers of publications.

Editorial Board  - an advisory body of eminent persons group, which has a chief editor of the aid in the selection, training and evaluation of works for publication.

Reviewer  - expert acting on behalf of a scientific journal or publishing and conducting scientific examination of copyright materials in order to determine the possibility of their publication.

Manuscript  - submitted for publication in the editorial work of authorship, but not published.

The reader  - any person to get acquainted with the published material.

1. Principles of Professional Ethics in the publisher's activity.

In its activities, the publisher responsible for the publication of copyright works, which entails the need to follow the following basic principles and procedures:

1.1. To promote ethical execution responsibilities edited, editing and publishing group Editorial Board, the reviewers and the authors in accordance with these requirements.
1.2. To support the editorial staff in the examination of claims to the ethical aspects of published materials and help interact with other journals and / or publishers if they facilitate the execution of the duties of editors.
1.3. Ensure the confidentiality of the authors of the publication, and any information before it is published.
1.4. To realize that the activity log is not a commercial project and does not carry the target profit.
1.5. Always be ready to publish corrections, explanations, denials and apologies when necessary.
1.6. To provide the possibility to exclude the magazine publications containing plagiarism and inaccurate data.
1.7. Publisher (editor), has the right to reject a manuscript from the author or request its revision, if it is decorated with violations of the Rules adopted in this magazine, and agreed with the publisher.
1.8. The article, in case of acceptance for publication, placed in the public domain; copyright reserved by the authors.
1.9. Place the information on the financial support of the study, if the author of this information to the article leads.
1.10. When detecting content, grammatical, stylistic and other errors edition will take all measures to eliminate them.
1.11. To agree with the author, introduced by Article editorial proofreading.
1.12. Not to delay the issue of the magazine.

2. The ethical principles that should guide the author of a scientific publication.

Authors (or group of authors) when submitting materials in a scientific journal is aware that bears the initial responsibility for the novelty and validity of the results of scientific research, which involves the following principles:

2.1. The authors should provide reliable research results. Knowingly false or fraudulent statements unacceptable.
2.2. Authors should ensure that the results of the study as set out in the submitted manuscript is completely original. Borrowed fragments or statements must be filed with the obligatory indication of the author and the source. Excessive borrowing and plagiarism in any form, including unregistered quotes, paraphrasing or assignment of rights to the results of other people's research, unethical and unacceptable. Availability of loans without reference to be considered by the editorial board as plagiarism.
2.3. Authors should result in the manuscript only true facts and information; give sufficient information for checking and repetition of experiments by other investigators; not use information obtained in private, without prior explicit authorization; not to allow the fabrication and falsification of data.
2.4. Avoid duplication of publications (in the cover letter the author must indicate that the work is published for the first time). If the individual elements of the manuscript have been previously published, the author is obliged to refer to the earlier work and specify the differences between the new work from the previous one.
2.5. Authors should not submit the manuscript to the journal, which has been sent to another journal and is under consideration, as well as an article already published in another journal.
2.6. It is necessary to recognize the contributions of all persons, one way or another influenced the course of the study, in particular, the article must be submitted references to works that have value in the research.
2.7. Authors should follow the ethical standards, criticized or comments in relation to third-party research.
2.8. Co-authors of the article should include all the persons who have made a significant contribution to the study. Among the co-authors is unacceptable to specify persons who are not involved in the study.
2.9. Authors must respect the work of the editorial board and reviewers and eliminate these drawbacks or clarify their arguments.
2.10. Authors are required to submit and execute the manuscript according to the rules adopted in the magazine.
2.11. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the article on the stage of examination or after its publication, he must immediately notify the editorial office;
2.12. Authors must provide the editorial board or the publisher proof of the correctness of the original article or to correct significant errors, if known editorial board or the publisher has learned from a third party.

3. Ethical principles in the activities of the reviewer

Reviewer provides scientific expertise of copyright material, so that its actions should be impartial in nature, which consists in the following principles:

3.1. Manuscript received for review, it should be regarded as a confidential document, which can not be transferred for review or discussion of third parties that do not have at the office of the publisher.
3.2. Reviewers are required to know that the manuscript sent to them by the intellectual property of the authors and are reportedly not subject to disclosure. Breach of confidentiality is possible only in case of a declaration of invalidity of the reviewer or falsification of materials contained in the article;
3.3. The reviewer should pay attention to the chief editor of a significant or partial similarity of the manuscript evaluated with any other work, as well as the absence of references to the situation, the findings or arguments previously published in other works of this or other authors.
3.4. The reviewer should note relevant published work that are not quoted (in the article).
3.5. The reviewer is required to give an objective and reasoned assessment of the results of the study outlined and well-founded recommendations. Personal criticism of the author is not acceptable.
3.6. Comments and suggestions of the reviewer should be objective and principled, aimed at improving the scientific level of the manuscript.
3.7. The reviewer should make decisions based on the specific facts and give evidence of their solutions.
3.8. The referees are not allowed to make copies of the manuscript for their needs.
3.9. Reviewers are not allowed to take advantage of the knowledge of the content of the work prior to its publication.
3.10. The reviewer who does not have, in his opinion, is qualified to assess the manuscript, or may not be an objective, for example, in case of conflict of interest to the author or organization must inform the editor requesting to exclude it from the process of review of the manuscript;
3.11. Review article is confidential. Name of Reviewer know the executive secretary and chief editor of the magazine. This information is not disclosed.

4. The principles of professional ethics in the work of the Chief Editor.

In its activities, the editor in chief is responsible for the publication of copyright works, which imposes the need to follow the following basic principles:

4.1. When deciding on the publication of the chief editor of a scientific journal is guided by the certainty of data and the scientific significance of the work in question.
4.2. Chief editor should evaluate manuscripts intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, origin, nationality, social status or political preferences of the authors.
4.3. Unpublished data from submitted manuscripts for consideration, should not be used for personal purposes or transferred to third parties without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained in the course of editing, and related to the potential benefits must be kept confidential and not be used for personal gain.
4.4. Editor in chief should not be allowed to publish the information, if there is sufficient reason to believe that it is plagiarism.
4.5. Editor in chief of its activities shall:
- continually improve the magazine;
- follow the principle of freedom;
- strive to meet the needs of readers and authors of the journal;
- eliminate the influence of business interests or policy decisions on the publication of materials;
- decide on the publication of materials, guided by the following main criteria: compliance manuscript Themes; urgency, novelty and scientific significance of the article; clarity of presentation; the accuracy and completeness of the results of the findings. The quality of the research and its relevance are the basis for the decision to publish;
- take all reasonable measures to ensure the quality of published materials and to protect the confidentiality of personal information;
- take into account the reviewers' recommendations when making a final decision on the publication of the article. The responsibility for the decision to publish lies entirely on the editorial board;
- to justify its decision in the case of acceptance or rejection of article;
- provide the author with an opportunity to peer-reviewed material to substantiate their research positions;
- by changing the composition of the editorial board did not overrule the decisions of the previous convocation of materiala.4.6 publication. Editor in Chief, together with the publisher should not be left without an answer claims relating to the examination of manuscripts and published materials, as well as the detection of a conflict to take all necessary measures to restore the violated rights.

5. Guidelines for the issuance of articles

5.1. Compliance with the ethics of publishing the editorial board.
5.2. Compliance with the guidelines when you reject articles.
5.3. Maintaining the integrity of academic writing.
5.4. To prevent damage to the intellectual and ethical standards in the presence of commercial interests.
5.5. Willingness to publish corrections, clarifications, deviations and apologize when necessary.
5.6. Preventing publication of plagiarism and fraudulent data.

6. Conflict of interest.

In order to avoid violations of Publication Ethics to exclude the conflict of interests of all parties involved in the publication of the manuscript. A conflict of interest arises when the author, reviewer and member of editorial board has financial, academic or personal relationship that may affect their action. Such a relationship is called dual commitments, competing interests, or competing loyalties.

Violations.

If you encounter a situation involving a violation of the ethics of publication by the editor, author or reviewer, mandatory investigation required. This applies to both published and unpublished material. The Editorial Board is obliged to demand an explanation, without the involvement of individuals who may have a conflict of interest with one of the parties.

If the material containing substantial inaccuracies, was published, it must be immediately corrected in a form accessible to readers and indexing systems.