Preview

Genetics and breeding of animals

Advanced search

Study of the genetic structure of domestic and wild reindeer in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) using STR analysis

https://doi.org/10.31043/2410-2733-2022-3-5-11

Abstract

Aim: evaluation of the current state of the genetic and allelic diversity of domestic and wild reindeer populations inhabiting the territory of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), using STR markers.

Materials and methods. The sample of the domestic reindeer included animals from Even (EVN, n=33), Evenk (EVK, n=31), and Chukchi (Khargin) breeds (KH, n=33). The sample of wild reindeer comprised representatives of the tundra (WLD_TUN, n=119) and taiga (WLD_TGA, n=14) populations.

Polymorphism analysis of 14 STR loci including NVHRT21, NVHRT24, NVHRT76, RT1, RT6, RT7, RT9, RT27, RT30, RT25, RT13, NV03, RT5, and NV73 was performed using proprietary methods on ABI3130xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Allelic and genetic diversity parameters were calculated using GenAlEx software (ver. 6.5.1) and R package “diveRsity”.

To address the genetic structure, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using the R package adegenet and visualized in the R package gglot2.

The genetic differentiation of reindeer populations was performed based on a matrix of pairwise FST values and visualized as a phylogenetic tree using the Neighbor-Net algorithm in the SplitsTree 4.14.5 program.

Results. Analysis of genetic diversity parameters showed that the observed heterozygosity was the lowest in WLD_TGA (HO = 0.520) among all studied groups and varied from 0.615 in KH to 0.691 in EVK. All reindeer groups were characterized by a heterozygote deficit, as evidenced by the positive values of the inbreeding coefficient: from UFIS = 0.101 in EVK to UFIS = 0.372 in WLD_TGA. The mean number of alleles per locus varied from 7.1 in EVN to 12.4 in WLD_TUN. Wild reindeer had higher allelic richness (AR = 7.8–8.6 and AR = 6.2–6.8, respectively) and number of effective alleles per locus (NE = 5.3–6, 9 and NE = 4.1 – 4.5, respectively) in comparison with their domestic relatives. Principal Component Analysis showed that the first Principal Component separated wild reindeer from the domestic reindeer. Analyzing pairwise FST values, we found that the KH was the most genetically distant from domestic reindeer breeds (FST = 0.072 between KH and EVN, and FST = 0.065 between KH and EVK) and from wild reindeer populations (FST = 0.076 between KH and WLD_TGA, and FST = 0.06 between KH and WLD_TUN). Pairs EVN and EVK (FST = 0.047), as well as WLD_TUN and WLD_TGA (FST = 0.008) were characterized by insignificant genetic differentiation. Neighbor Net graph showed the formation of two clusters including wild and domestic reindeer populations

Conclusion. The results may be useful for development of breeding programs for breeds of domestic reindeer and conservation programs for wild reindeer.

About the Authors

A. Solovieva
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Post-graduate student

142132, Russian Federation, Moscow region, Podolsk city district, Dubrovitsy settlement 60.



V. Kharzinova
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

PhD (Biol. Sci.)

142132, Russian Federation, Moscow region, Podolsk city district, Dubrovitsy settlement 60.



T. Deniskova
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

PhD (Biol. Sci.)



N. Zinovieva
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Dr. Habil (Biol. Sci.), Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences

142132, Russian Federation, Moscow region, Podolsk city district, Dubrovitsy settlement 60.



References

1. Bryzgalov G.Ya., Ignatovich L.S. Associations of indicators of genotypic diversity and live weight in populations of deer of the Chukchi breed. Genetics and animal breeding. 2021. No. 2. S. 36-44. doi: 10.31043/2410-2733-2021-2-36-44.

2. Vladimirov L.N. Technology of fence breeding of reindeer in the taiga zone of Central Yakutia. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals, no. 6, 2007, pp. 31-33.

3. Dodokhov V.V., Pavlova N.I., Rumyantseva T.D., Kalashnikova L.A. Genetic characteristics of the Chukchi deer breed in Yakutia. Genetics and animal breeding. 2020. No. 3. S. 27-32.

4. Okorokov A. I. On the state and development of domestic reindeer breeding in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Bulletin of the North-Eastern Federal University. M. K. Ammosova, vol. 10, no. 3, 2013, pp. 36-41.

5. Safronov V.M. Wild reindeer in Yakutia. Science and technology in Yakutia. 2003. No. 2 (5). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dikiy-severnyy-olen-v-yakutii (Date of access: 08/11/2022).

6. Deniskova T.E., Kharzinova V.R., Dotsev A.V., Solov'eva А.D., Romanenko Т.М., Yuzhakov А.А., Layshev К.А., Brem G., Zinovieva N.A. Genetic characteristics of regional populations of Nenets reindeer breed (Rangifer Tarandus). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2018, V. 53, ¹ 6, pp. 1152-1161. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.6.1152eng

7. Hartl D.L., Clark A.G. Principles of population genetics, United Kingdom: Sunderland, 1997.

8. Huson D. H., Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. – 2006. № 23. P. 254–267 (doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030).

9. Jombart T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics, 2008, № 24: 1403-1405. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129).

10. Keenan K., McGinnity P., Cross T. F., Crozier W.W., Prodöhl P.A. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013. № 4: 782–788. (doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12067).

11. Kharzinova V.R., Gladyr' E.A., Fedorov V.I., Romanenko T.M., Shimit L.D., Layshev K.A., Kalashnikova L.A., Zinovieva N.A. Development of multiplex microsatellite panel to assess the parentage verification in and differentiation degree of reindeer populations (Rangifer tarandus). Agricultural Biology, 2015, 50(6): 756-765 (doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2015.6.756eng)

12. Kharzinova V.R., Dotsev A.V., Deniskova T.E., Solovieva A.D., Brem G., Zinovieva N.A., Fedorov V.I., Layshev K.A., Romanenko T.M., Okhlopkov I.M., Wimmers K., Reyer H. Genetic diversity and population structure of domestic and wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L. 1758): a novel approach using BovineHD Beadchip. PLoS ONE. 2018 (13) 11 e0207944.

13. Kol N. V., Korolev A. L., Zacharov I. A. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in Tuvinian population of reindeer Rangifer tarandus. Genetika. — 2006. —42(1). — p. 110–112.

14. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing. Vienna. – Austria. - 2012. http://www.Rproject.org. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.

15. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research — an update. Bioinformatics – 2012. № 28. P. 2537-2539 (doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460).

16. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 1984

17. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. NY. - Springer-Verlag. – 2009.


Review

For citations:


Solovieva A., Kharzinova V., Deniskova T., Zinovieva N. Study of the genetic structure of domestic and wild reindeer in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) using STR analysis. Genetics and breeding of animals. 2022;(3):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31043/2410-2733-2022-3-5-11

Views: 525


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-2733 (Print)